Terry Finnigan, London College of Fashion and Aisha Richards, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts, London
Retention and attainment in the disciplines: Art and Design
Finnigan and Richards explore a deep dive into the inclusive practices of multiple sources that have been generated from lived experiences, missing data and loss of retention in BAME/BIPOC students in Creative Higher education in art and design. The focus on student voices is crucial to course structure and design, but vitally important to course longevity and student satisfaction.
The resource tells of student retention numbers and the complexity of differences between white students and students from a British Caribbean, Black or British African Students and those of other black backgrounds, a whopping difference of 6-7%. Also explained that further raw data is needed to allow practitioners and staff to understand this more, due to the fact that this information is ‘on those who achieved upper degrees and those who leave without a degree’.
One of the questions that emerged from this research;
What types of activities and interventions are taking place to impact the over-arching differing attainment and retention of students of colour in Art and Design subjects?
As a technician, I don’t particularly see any inclusive activities or interventions happening around race and inclusive practice within the workshop areas, which is a shared specialist workshop for knit students hosted by academics. What I would desire to see, as a practitioner is more awareness around craft with inclusivity, why are we learning specific techniques and can the origin of these be related to inclusive practice?
One of the BA1 workshops around the introduction to punchcard techniques (Fairisle/Multicoloured textiles) could be transformed into an open intervention between the ‘classic’ history of the Fairisle and Shetland isles to the modern day expansion of African colour work in knitted textiles or the revolution of Norwegian style mosaic knitting expanding across middle-eastern and south American knitting communities. Or the discussion between ‘pointelle’ lace knitting and how the Japanese Knitters have adapted this technique into their own work creating such beautiful complex lace structures based on Japanese culture.
As a whole team, we haven’t touched the surface of inclusive practice in our workshops, unfortunately, I don’t have the power to even suggest a change, when I have done so in the past, I always get put down in the sense of ‘technical over creativity’.
This leads me to section 4.3 ‘Inclusive curriculum and Identity work’, as an Irish immigrant, I rely heavily on my Irish craft identity to help support my ‘research structure’ by using my advantage of heritage/generational knitting skills to ‘scaffold’ my practice. I have personally seen students be shunned for their personality identity research and discouraged from exploring and taking a risk. Merely my opinion is that academics are afraid of student failure and risk-taking, or not being qualified to guide students in this area.
‘Art education has generally been conservative, repetitive and exclusive. Art education theorists have even described art education as Eurocentric, racist and imperialist and have called for curriculum reform and social change. (Hatton 2015, p. 3)’
As a technician, I play a rhizomatic pedagogy in teaching students, I personally like to learn, I am a peer as well as a tutor, but my goal is to help students understand. Part of this is exploring where they come from and where they want to go with their practice. I have been learning Mandarin as a mere day-to-day conversationist to help our majority Chinese cohort feel like they belong in my workshops and that I am approachable and easy to talk to, even the simplest formats of greetings can dramatically change a student’s body language towards tutors. Although my practice is more personal for me, rather than the schools, I am starting to see more cracks in the foundations of course design, that don’t cater for reflective, critical or open discussions around individualism, identity, craft and practice.
After reading this article, I may have the opportunity within the workshop space to help reduce retention loss and allow students to engage in succeeding in higher education. My personal practice is family/generational orientated, this is about community building and inclusive safe space building within my workshop environments, something that can be achievable from all technicians outside of courses and academic structures.
One of the most achievable outcomes of inclusive practice, I have personally achieved, is allowing final-year students to write words of encouragement throughout the workshop area. The student cohort was majority Chinese, but we also had, Zimbabwean, Italian, Korean and Greek students participate. The goal was to encourage, them to find the energy to complete the final hurdle of their final major project, I provided the English words, on A4 paper and those students were encouraged by me, to write the same meaning in their own language. So, when they came into the workshop again, they knew this last hurdle was not lonely, or about themselves, but that each one of their classmates was living the same experience.